
So would you? A windmill, I mean. Would you install a windmill in your garden? I was asking myself this yesterday as I pondered whether I should be making another short haul flight down to the Auverne.
So I Googled ‘windmills’ - or rather ‘small wind turbines’ and lo! it turns out that there are folk ready to sell me a dainty little model on a 10 metre stalk, set in a block of concrete and connected to my fuse box for the measly sum of £9,000.
With my thoughts still on the Auverne I calculate that once £9,000 would have been about €5,000 - now it’s about €10,000 euros - another illustration of how Britain will quickly have to learn how to become self-sufficient for it is rapidly becoming too expensive to buy anything from abroad - like oil, for instance, or gas.
Now £9,000 doesn’t seem unreasonable for a big concrete block in the windward corner of my garden with a windmill on top. I could even see it finally extinguishing the ever expanding Yucca plant with which I am due another skirmish shortly.
Quite indestructible are Yuccas, except perhaps by large amounts of concrete, though I’m told they are a useful plant if you’re about to become self-sufficient. You can weave the fibres into cloth and use the pointed leaves as skewers or needles. Allegedly.
Besides the demise of the Yucca, my windmill would bring me free energy and in addition £0.12 for every kilowatt hour I returned to the grid. Quite a bargain, except that the tables say I live in a spot less windy than the average and therefore that my windmill would supply only one third of the electricity that I use.
What! less that averagely windy? There are times when the wind howls and I fear for my fences. I have already lost half a fig tree. I see from my window that the trees are tossing merrily. On the other hand yesterday it was quite still and for some days before that. So it seems it would take 60 years to get my money back, by which time I shall be dead, if I haven't succumbed to global warming in the meantime.
Still I would have built a windmill if it had been practical. I don’t object to how they look. The turbines high on the northern hills above my town have a certain ghostly elegance. The I thought that perhaps it would be more sensible to let someone else build the windmill and to buy the electricity from them.
So I emailed my current supplier who tells me that if I cut my consumption by 10 per cent I can move to a green tariff. But I haven’t cut my consumption by 10 per cent! And nor am I likely to. Despite my criticisms of the ban on incandescent light bulbs, virtually all the serious lighting in the house is energy saving. I am not going to sit in the dark, nor give up using the oven. And we already turn off at the wall where we can.
True we could go out and buy a new cooker, fridge and dishwasher - but the energy involved in their new manufacture (all that steel to be smelted and rolled from iron ore brought half way round the world, the paint and plastic made from hydrocarbons, the packaging and the overheated showrooms) mean that I’d be starting with a substantial carbon deficit (let alone a bank account deficit) which would require as long to payback as my windmill.
Why is there no requirement to inform us of the carbon cost of new energy saving appliances? Your new car may have low emissions but the factories that made it and brought it to you certainly don’t.
But a post from kind Woozle tells me of another company - Ecotricity - offering to sell me green electricity. Fine - but then I lose the discounts that I get from being with my existing supplier from whom I buy gas as well.
Besides, if I (and fellow eco-warriors) buy up all the green energy everyone else is left with the brown (non-renewable) stuff. I am not actually helping the poor old planet, however virtuous I may feel to be 100 per cent green. Though in fairness to Ecotricity they do say that they invest only in renewable sources of power.
What about gas on which the central heating runs? I’ve a feeling that you should be able to buy green gas, produced from biomass, though I haven’t seen this advertised anywhere. Why not, I wonder? The technology is available to produce gas from digesters and we do discard a vast potential source of biogas every time we visit the bathroom.
Apparently we expend 80 calories in fuel and fertiliser to produce one calorie’s worth of edible food. As someone said once we spend all this money creating this waste and then we just throw it away.
But I am still scratching my head about how best to atone for my flight down to the Auverne next week. There we are greener than here. Our heat comes from great wood burning stoves, our power from French nuclear electricity.
I have never had much fear of nuclear energy. Indeed I see it as much the best short term solution to providing the large amounts of standby power that the world demands. Britain was once a world leader in this field; a place we have sadly long ceded.
Indeed I read only this week that Areva, the French nuclear giant, hopes to build 60 reactors across the world in the next few years, including some in Britain. Demand is fast picking up, they say.
Maybe I shall get my low-carbon electricity after all. Meanwhile, I comfort myself that even with the Auverne trips our carbon footprint is still respectable. Well, just.

11 comments:
Goodness, it's a minefield, isn't it. There are no easy answers. Unfortunately, I think we have to forget about 'affordable' solutions - unrealistic though I know that really is - and think about radically changing a way of life that's already doomed.
Sadly, I think our problems are already way beyond turning appliances off standby and changing lightbulbs.
Re: heating and gas, I haven't yet heard a considered answer as to why we can't harvest some of the methane deposits under the permafrost, which is rapidly melting anyway, and will add horrifically to our global warming problem. Obviously, it's going to be expensive, but more expensive than drilling the oil under Brazil that's 3,000 metres or something deep?
I honestly think we're going to have to think about wearing warmer clothes instead of putting the heating on. I used to work with a woman who came to work in a T-shirt in the dead of winter and sat all day next to an electric fan heater - madness. Eat a lot less meat and start growing our own vegetables. Start taking public transport seriously, making sure it's efficient, affordable and practical. And stop buying things.
Yes, I know. It probably ain't going to happen in my lifetime.
We're gradually realising that as well as progress in the world, we desparately need to retain the old values....remembering the care of the world our ancestors naturally took.
LBD, re the permafrost, methane and and all that - I think it is because the methane isn't in a reservoir. It is frozen in the ice (or as hydrates under the ocean) but spread thinly like butter upon warm bread. Think of a pond from which the methane bubbles to the surface. There's a bubble here and a bubble there - no great quantity at all. But imagine the artic region as one great frozen pond and obviously you have got a very large quantity of methane.
I'll be interested to hear what the answer is, Fennie. But looking at windfarms is something I loathe.
PS I think I'm entitled to say that I've done my darndest over the years to keep my carbon footprint as tiny as possible; lack of money has meant many years with one car, no flying, making clothes last and eating little meat. In other words a whole bunch of stuff that some people are only just cottoning on to. I'll get off my soap box now.
Yes, Fennie, it's a shame the numbers don't mount up - your own windmill nor Ecotricity's. This government (does any?) doesn't give us enough of a leg up to "green-up" our homes. We hardly use our oil central heating and make more use of the log burner (our own wood too this year - all of it!) and we are biting the bullet and finally replacing the glass in our windows with double glazed units. We have found a local supplier who will double glaze our old traditional windows - we will lose the wibbly wobbly old glass but retain the frames. We can't be sentimental about it. Sob......xx
Hello Fennie, and thank you for your contemplating how energy questions intermingle. The old peeling of the onion image comes to my mind.
Thank you also for your kind comments re making a calendar. That sounds interesting, but will have to wait for available time. Right now I am wondering how I will be able to paint this year's Christmas cards!
xo
Hi Fennie, we looked into a windmill too but the economics just don't add up. you are right though that the real answer is in living more as we used to. All our children know to bring extra jumpers here and we keep only one room, the sitting room, lovely and cosy and the rest of the house is cool. We grow lots of our own food and try not to waste things. I despair when I see people still buying huge amounts of stuff (even designer handbags as LBD says!) when hyperconsumerism is part of what has got us here in the first place. I worried about the flight to France we have just taken but in the end I tried to persuade myself that we live pretty greenly most of the time.
Yes, lovely wood-burning stoves, as Fennie says here in the Auvergne (note the 'g' Fennie) but one is now caput and we may have to replace it.
We have been sleeping in an unheated bedroom with frost every night for the last week and we haven't minded a bit. The bathroom is toasty mind you.
See you all soon - back next week. We have a viewing on Monday next from a prospective buyer - don't know what I feel about that at the moment.
I've always found wearing nice thick woolly jumpers a good simple energy saver. It might sound too simplistic, but it always amazes me when one goes into friends' houses in winter and the heating is turned up high and they're wearing summer clothes!
Hello Fennie, and thank you so much for your comment with its wonderfully spooky tribute to country graveyards. I have been to some in your fair country and know what you mean. (Never visited any at night, though!)
xo
Post a Comment