Sunday, 16 May 2010

LETTER TO AMERICA


My dear blogging friend, Frances, from New York, commented recently on a theatre production that I had just directed. What she wrote was: “I am curious to learn more about how your group arose, how long it's been going, whatever you'd like to tell, actually. It amazes me that folks are willing to give their time to such an activity...not just for one production, but for season after season.”

Well, let me try to respond to that. But before I do I have to say that I am astonished that a city like New York shouldn’t be teeming with amateur drama, opera, dance and circus groups of every kind, catering to every possible taste. While amateur theatre here in Britain may not be thriving quite so vibrantly as it did thirty or forty years ago, there is still a strong tradition of theatre over here.

As you know we Brits tend to be rather more formal, more constrained, less expressive of sentiment than many folk. We still try not to cry and to keep a stiff upper lip. Yet despite this stereotype - or maybe even because of it - we seize any opportunity to ‘let our hair down.’ Charades are played with vigour in elegant drawing rooms, regiments in the field hold concert parties, prisoners put on plays and pantomimes in jail, out of work actors ply for coins in the streets. (You can still see London people busking in Covent Garden, for example, by reciting Shakespeare).

Wanting to perform seems to me to be a basic human instinct. And acting when you can step for a moment out of your personality that everyone knows and metamorphose into a charmer or a villain is truly liberating. The shy person becomes the extrovert and the extrovert, fretful and shy. The young become old, the rich poor. In some bizarre sense which has to be experienced, the stage is a runway from which people can take off and remain airborne so long as the 650 watt spots play upon them. As a therapy for the wayward and for the deprived, the theatre is rightly acknowledged.

So that’s one reason why we do it. Another is the magnificent camaraderie. There are often fierce and spiteful battles too, but camaraderie wins each time. Not for nothing do theatre people call themselves ‘luvvies.’ You may think that calling people ‘darling’ all the time is repulsive - and it is a little - but a company in front of an audience does experience a feeling of togetherness, of experience shared, of genuine happiness that binds them together in such a way that they do feel like a family.

As the old song has it ‘there’s no business like show business’ - and that is true no matter on how humble a level the show may appear.

Our own theatre and our own little group started right after the Second World War ended. I am not familiar with the details but after the trauma of that experience folk rebuilt their communities after years of austerity and began to have fun again. At someone’s initiation a group came together here to put on plays.

You may think that is a difficult thing - but it isn’t. Just a few people can sit in a room or in the park with a theatre script and just read a play. That’s a start. From there you can go on - learning the lines, finding somewhere to rehearse and perform, somebody volunteering to build the set and make costumes - little by little you move forward. It is not actually difficult.

Our group managed to acquire a couple of ‘portacabins’ - imagine trailers without wheels perhaps - and leased from the council some land on which to install them. In these they used to store costumes and build sets and rehearse. Performances took place on the grand stage of the Town Hall.

But then luck came our way and we got a grant from the National Lottery to put permanent walls in place of the ‘portacabins’ and so our little 70 seat theatre was built. And it was built largely by volunteers, laying bricks and pouring concrete. Much equipment, seating and so on was obtained secondhand and bit by bit the theatre developed into what we have today. This, sadly, all took place way before my time.

Now we have to keep the theatre going, which is less easy than putting on plays. In the old days the company had 60 or 70 members. It was hard to win a part in a play so great was the competition. Now we have about a third of that number and far fewer patrons prepared to be generous with their funds.

Partly this is due to people working longer and harder; it is not just our society, voluntary societies everywhere have seen a fall in their numbers. As the older folk retire, there are insufficient new and young recruits these days coming along to replace them.

I do my best to encourage them! There really is no better place to get a buzz. I think of Sammy Davies Junior and his remark “ I’m a ham - I really am. When I open the refrigerator, the light goes on. I do twenty minutes!” And yes, when the lights go on it is as if a part of that electricity goes not into the light but into your very soul.

Let me leave you with the Little Prince - star of our last show - and who says “You can only truly see things clearly with the heart. What is essential remains invisible to the eyes.” he could have been speaking of the theatre.

And that’s why, there really is ‘no business like show business.’

Sunday, 9 May 2010

(DARK) KNIGHTSHAYES



I had been chattering to elder daughter about visiting Knightshayes Court ever since Exmoor Jane blogged about it some moons ago. And dutiful daughter that she is she put it on the itinerary to fill most of a day out we were planning together. Confusing Taunton with Tiverton I had thought it was just at the other end of the rather extravagant county of Somerset but of course it wasn't and we were well into the uplands of Devon before we arrived at something that I imagined must be what Mandalay looked like before it was set on fire by Mrs Danvers, and if it did look like that my sympathies, I think, would have lain firmly with Mrs Danvers.

The gardens, though, are magnificent but the house is grimly forbidding. It is arch Victoriana of the very worst kind and clearly designed by the very worst kind of man to be populated by characters from a Gothic film script. I very much doubt if any woman had any say in its design or decoration. It has a cold aggressive and intimidatory maleness to it that must have made it quite horrible to live in. Why were the Victorians like this, I wonder?

Imagine Miss Haversham's house without the cobwebs. And no need for curtains either for why bother with windows when you can have walls panelled in dark wood to make you feel spooky, especially when hung with dead animals. Go into one of the bedrooms and the head of an enormous tiger roars at you from the rug into into which his skin has been deftly turned. Apart from the impractically - imagine blundering about in the dark and tripping over this head the size of two footballs - the things is just so unrestful.

Forced to live in the place no doubt as inheritance no doubt dictated, the family of Heathcoat Amery's seem to have done their best to open the place up, lower some of the ceilings, replace extravagant and incomprehensible ornamentation with something vaguely comfortable on the eye, French windows to the garden, a kitchen in a location actually useful from which to prepare and serve food. But all to no avail. Ever since acquiring the house, the National Trust has set to with a will and in a fury of restoration has unburied the work of that eccentric and horrible man William Burges and returned the house to its original gloomy and brooding state.

What aberration caused architecture to turn from the beautiful proportions and elegant decoration of the Georgians to such monstrosity? The best you can say about Burges is that he had a vivid imagination, but he was also an architectural tyrant, apparently devoid of any sentiment or feeling, but with an indefatigable ability to sell ugliness.

He was employed by the Marquess of Bute (who owned half of Cardiff) to put his stamp on the place and on Cardiff Castle especially. Think Palace of Westminster and Pugin and then imagine that Pugin might have had a wayward and miserable sibling, born in a cellar and with a tendency to drinking too much white wine on an empty stomach, and you have Burges.

On the ruined site of an ancient castle just outside Cardiff, Burges created 'Castell Coch,' which looks like the model for every Disney castle you've ever seen. All turrets and drawbridges but inevitably, this being a Burges creation, set into a dark wood on a dark mountain and with very small windows. Still the sight of those elfin towers sends intending couples scurrying up the hill to get married in this spot of heraldic gloom. Dungeons must surely have more charm.

All I can say is that Knightshayes is built in exactly the same style. And now a fortune has been spent on its restoration. I can admire the great craftsmanship, but just wonder why anyone with any appreciation of beauty should want to lend their name or their money to such an architectural cacophony? It is like seeing hanging, drawing and quartering likened to enlightened retribution.



But the gardens are really beautiful and well worth going to see.